On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 08:14 -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 10/20/2005 2:17 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> > (I can't believe anyone really wants varchar to be space padded. Space padding
> > always seemed like a legacy feature for databases with fixed record length
> > data types. Why would anyone want a string data type that can't represent all
> > strings?)
>
> They must have buried that "bow to COBOL" so deep in the code that they
> had no choice but to abuse their power and stuff this cruft into the
> standard.
>
MOVE SPACES TO 0101
You just gotta love it
Andy