On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 22:24 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:00:46PM +0400, Ilia Kantor wrote:
> > Your suggestion is essentially the same as mine..
> > There exists tableoid, pretty much suited to tell between tables in the case
> > of inheritance.. I can't see a "real" need to add a special "class
> > classifier" to each table..
> > This solution is a workaround. It will work, just can't make myself love it.
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to tweak the constraints exclusion
> code so that if it sees something of the form "tableoid = X" to exclude
> other tables...
>
> You know, assume each table has a constraint "tableoid = OID".
>
> Still, it is a fairly unusual feature.
As I pointed out, the solution I proposed works with CE, in comparison
with selecting a tableoid, which does not. It also costs 1 byte per row.
Jim Nasby requested a similar feature a couple of months back.
Essentially this request reduces to the idea of having attributes that
are constant for all rows of a table. That doesn't have any side or
additional benefits AFAICS, so improving that case isn't going to be at
the top of a worthwhile-improvements list for a long time yet,
especially since the CE list already has at least 10 items on it.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs