Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11260.1352309343@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed
via SQL
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> You could dig it out of the stack if it's there, but that doesn't fix
>> the race-condition aspect. Now a race is inevitable if two sessions try
>> to set the *same* variable, but I think people will be unhappy if a SET
>> on one variable makes a recent SET on some other variable disappear.
> I think if we require an exclusive lock on a single global lock for
> "set permanent", people are quite ok with that, really.
That doesn't fix it either, at least not without a whole lot of other
changes --- we don't normally read the config file within-commands,
and there are both semantic and implementation problems to overcome
if you want to do so.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: