Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Jul-02, Tom Lane wrote:
>> * The persistence description values ought to be translatable, as
>> is the usual practice in describe.c.  This is slightly painful
>> because it requires tweaking the translate_columns[] values in a
>> non-constant way, but it's not that bad.

> LGTM.  I only fear that the cols_so_far thing is easy to break, and the
> breakage will be easy to miss.

Yeah, but that's pretty true of all the translatability stuff in
describe.c.  I wonder if there's any way to set up tests for that.
The fact that the .po files lag so far behind the source code seems
like an impediment --- even if we made a test case that presumed
--enable-nls and tried to exercise this, the lack of translations
for the new words would get in the way for a long while.

            regards, tom lane