Re: VACUUM DATABASE

On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 19:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:41:24PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> 
> > Forgive me if this is wrong, but I took that Alvaro was applying a
> > "reductio ad absurdum" argument (i.e. taking the piss). I laughed
> > heartily at the thought of LAZY becoming a PostgreSQL keyword. 
> 
> Ah, well, actually you are wrong, I was really suggesting that keyword
> because that's what we call the feature.  It doesn't sound that bad to
> me, but if you laughed at it then maybe it's really a bad idea.

Then I apologize, but agree with your conclusion.

I think a headline of "PostgreSQL gets LAZY" would be irresistable for
the online news scream-sheets.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs