Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL?
От | Jeffrey W. Baker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1121347644.8468.3.camel@noodles обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL? (Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 10:03 +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote: > On 7/14/05, Jeffrey W. Baker <jwbaker@acm.org> wrote: > > [reposted due to delivery error -jwb] > > > > I just took delivery of a new system, and used the opportunity to > > benchmark postgresql 8.0 performance on various filesystems. The system > > in question runs Linux 2.6.12, has one CPU and 1GB of system memory, and > > 5 7200RPM SATA disks attached to an Areca hardware RAID controller > > having 128MB of cache. The caches are all write-back. > > > > I ran pgbench with a scale factor of 1000 and a total of 100,000 > > transactions per run. I varied the number of clients between 10 and > > 100. It appears from my test JFS is much faster than both ext3 and XFS > > for this workload. JFS and XFS were made with the mkfs defaults. ext3 > > was made with -T largefile4 and -E stride=32. The deadline scheduler > > was used for all runs (anticipatory scheduler is much worse). > > > > Here's the result, in transactions per second. > > > > ext3 jfs xfs > > ----------------------------- > > 10 Clients 55 81 68 > > 100 Clients 61 100 64 > > ---------------------------- > > If you still have a chance, could you do tests with other journaling > options for ext3 (journal=writeback, journal=data)? And could you > give figures about performace of other IO elevators? I mean, you > wrote that anticipatory is much wore -- how much worse? :) Could > you give numbers for deadline,anticipatory,cfq elevators? :) > > And, additionally would it be possible to give numbers for bonnie++ > results? To see how does pgbench to bonnie++ relate? Phew, that's a lot of permutations. At 20-30 minutes per run, I'm thinking 5-8 hours or so. Still, for you dear readers, I'll somehow accomplish this tedious feat. As for Bonnie, JFS is a good 60-80% faster than ext3. See my message to ext3-users yesterday. Using bonnie++ with a 10GB fileset, in MB/s: ext3 jfs xfs Read 112 188 141 Write 97 157 167 Rewrite 51 71 60 -jwb
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: