Re: Vacuum summary?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Vacuum summary?
Дата
Msg-id 1121150862.3970.98.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Vacuum summary?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Vacuum summary?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 12:38 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > 
> >>What do you guys think of having a vacuum summary command? E.g.;
> > 
> > 
> >>VACUUM [FULL] [ANALYZE] SUMMARY
> > 
> > 
> > ... that will turn SUMMARY into a fully reserved word ...
> 
> Hmmm... good point. Other options would be:
> 
> brief
> short
> terse?
> nutshell ;)
> review
> report -- This one is interesting although sufffers from the same problem.
> 

Good idea. I think its a good idea to make that info easily accessible.

How about putting this in the logfile, without any command changes?

Best Regards, Simon Riggs



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuum summary?