Re: Make COUNT(*) Faster?
| От | Rod Taylor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Make COUNT(*) Faster? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1120837111.24708.252.camel@home обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Make COUNT(*) Faster? (Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 17:34 +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote: > On 7/8/05, Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca> wrote: > > Create 2 sequences, one for counting tuple additions and one for > > counting tuple deletions. > > > > When you INSERT a tuple, bump the "added" sequence (select nextval()); > > > > When you DELETE a tuple, bump the "deleted" sequence (select nextval()); > > > > To retrieve an approximate count, take the current value of both > > sequences (select directly -- don't use currval) and subtract the > > "deletes" from the "adds". > > Never thought of that! Good idea. :-) > > Regards, > Dawid > > PS: There aren't any on ROLLBACK triggers, right? ;-))) No. You could make then RI triggers and have them deferred until commit though. --
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: