Re: disabled SSL log_like tests

I wrote:
> The fact that mamba hasn't been failing on the other affected
> tests is a bit puzzling.  mamba isn't running kerberos or ldap
> or oauth_validator, so the lack of failures there is expected.
> authentication/t/001_password.pl appears accidentally not vulnerable:
> it's not using log_like in any connect_fails tests.  (It is using
> log_unlike, so those tests could be giving silent false negatives.)
> But authentication/t/003_peer.pl has 8 test cases that look
> vulnerable.  I guess there must be some extra dollop of timing
> weirdness in the ssl tests that's not there in 003_peer.pl.

After pushing this patch, the probable explanation for the "extra
timing weirdness" finally penetrated my brain: the error reports
we are looking for are cases that are detected by OpenSSL.  So
it's plausible that OpenSSL has told the connecting client to
go away before it returns the error indication to the backend's
calling code, which would be what would log the message.  That is
what provides the window for a race condition.  You still need
a bunch of assumptions about the kernel's subsequent scheduling
of psql and the TAP script versus the backend, but the whole
thing is certainly dependent on psql getting the word sooner
than the backend.

(Not all of the tests disabled by 55828a6b6 meet this description,
but a bunch of them do, and I believe that I just zapped every
log_like condition in the script rather than trying to be selective
about which ones were known to have failed.)

It seems at least plausible that the Kerberos tests could have
a similar problem.  I'm less sure about LDAP or OAuth.  But
authentication/t/003_peer.pl would not, because elog.c emits errors
to the log before sending them to the client.  So that explains
the lack of buildfarm reports from mamba, and it's unclear that
we have any other animals with the right timing behavior to
see this.

            regards, tom lane