Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11202.1074005825@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes:
> Or, maybe we'll just use the tas() implementation that already exists for
> __i386__/__x86_64__ in s_lock.h. How did I miss that?
> Move along. Nothing to see here.
Actually, I was expecting you to complain that the s_lock.h coding is
gcc-specific. Which compilers do we need to support on Windows?
We might have to fall back to something comparable to the CVS-tip s_lock
support for hppa: inline assembler in s_lock.h for gcc, and a separate
assembly source file for use with vendor compiler(s).
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: