Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1118168337.26027.2585.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths? Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 13:49, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > > Hrmmmm ... I can see the argument for ... and without knowing what the > > conference area layout looks like, will the booths be at 'opposite ends' > > of the conference floor? If they are just going to be next to each > > other, then it seems redundant ... if you are looking at one at each > > 'end' (I realize that there is not necessarily an "end" per se), then > > two would make sense ... > > One will be in the .Org pavilion, one will be in the Commercial > Pavilion. I don't know how close they will be but they will not be next > to each other. > One issue that comes to mind is that we tend to make noise about being a community organization rather than just a piece of a specific corporate organization (like most of the other OS DB's)... would it not be odd if we had *no* presence in the community Pavilion? Might it confuse people who go looking in the community section for us and can't find any presence for postgresql? Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: