Re: Question about "Unrecognized SPI code" ...
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Question about "Unrecognized SPI code" ... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11181.1109097182@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Question about "Unrecognized SPI code" ... (Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:
> ERROR: SPI_execute_plan failed executing query "INSERT INTO
> view_nonsense VALUES (10, 20)": Unrecognized SPI code 0
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "debug" line 4 at SQL statement
> SPI_result_code_string(int code) and PL/pgSQL don't seem to be aware of
> DO NOTHING rules.
Hmm. What's happening is that _SPI_execute_plan() initializes its local
result variable to 0, and then that ends up getting returned because the
execute-one-query loop executes zero times. Since 0 isn't a defined SPI
result code, this seems bad.
The question is what to return instead. Of the currently defined SPI
result codes, SPI_OK_UTILITY seems the closest, but it implies that
something happened when nothing did. Is it worth inventing a new
result code SPI_OK_NOTHING (or similar) to describe this case? That
would possibly imply changing a lot of SPI-using code to handle the
new result alternative.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: