Re: Autonomous Transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Autonomous Transactions
Дата
Msg-id 1117830129.5758.84.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Autonomous Transactions  (Matt Miller <mattm@epx.com>)
Ответы Re: Autonomous Transactions
Список pgsql-general
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 15:10, Matt Miller wrote:
> > > a way to enable a function to commit a unit of work that
> > > does not affect the caller's transaction.
>
> > you can establish an independent connection within a function in, say,
> > PL/Perl or PL/Python.
>
> Okay, multiple connections seems to be my best shot.  However, I would
> like standard developers to be able to stay in PL/pgSQL and SQL.  If
> each of our anonymous transactions needs to be coded in PL/Perl then
> people are not as happy.  (Silly people.)
>
> So, can I write some dirty little utility functions (in PL/Perl, C,
> whatever) that a PL/pgSQL caller use to somehow switch connections?  The
> way our apps are currently structured I'm picturing that each app's
> logical connection is actually two physical connections: the main thread
> of control happens on one connection, and autonomous transactions happen
> on the other

Is dblink a possible answer?  (it's a contrib package.)

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Matt Miller
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autonomous Transactions
Следующее
От: Peter Fein
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Preventing Multiple Inheritance