Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance
От | Tino Wildenhain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1117777454.5018.4.camel@Andrea.peacock.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Am Freitag, den 03.06.2005, 00:36 +0200 schrieb Peter Eisentraut: > On a particular system, loading 1 million rows (100 bytes, nothing > fancy) into PostgreSQL one transaction at a time takes about 90 > minutes. Doing the same in MySQL/InnoDB takes about 3 minutes. InnoDB > is supposed to have a similar level of functionality as far as the > storage manager is concerned, so I'm puzzled about how this can be. > Does anyone know whether InnoDB is taking some kind of questionable > shortcuts it doesn't tell me about? The client interface is DBI. This > particular test is supposed to simulate a lot of transactions happening > in a short time, so turning off autocommit is not relevant. Maybe postgres' actually working ref-integrity checks bite here? That test is a bit vague - maybe we can see more details? :-) > As you might imagine, it's hard to argue when the customer sees these > kinds of numbers. So I'd take any FUD I can send back at them. :) >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: