On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 22:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Does that look better or worse to you?
I agree the patch's format is a bit off. What about
"mi" btree (i), tablespace "testspace"
"PRIMARY KEY" is currently separated from the rest of the index
description via a comma -- although on the other hand the column list
isn't preceded by a comma. Perhaps this whole format should be
rethought?
-Neil