Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1117626859.3844.945.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 16:34 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > There are some other arguments in favour of a LOAD command.... Alon? > > We already have LOAD, so you'll have to choose something else :) Its annoying, I grant you. :-) LOAD 'library' would still need to be the default. LOAD LIBRARY 'library' would be the new recommended usage. LOAD DATA... would be the new command... with most other options hanging off of that. There's no problem with that, since that is then the same as Oracle syntax for the load utility. Best Regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: