Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented
Дата
Msg-id 1117180.1627672927@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Here's a draft fix for master, with regression tests.

Passes an eyeball check, though I didn't run the test.

> It will need a bit of
> massaging for the back branches -- the problem goes back at least to 9.6.

I'm sure it's quite ancient ... ecpg hasn't changed much in a Long Time.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented
Следующее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented