Re: Does Postgresql have a similar pseudo-column "ROWNUM" as
От | Ragnar Hafstað |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does Postgresql have a similar pseudo-column "ROWNUM" as |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1116353539.26520.5.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does Postgresql have a similar pseudo-column "ROWNUM" as (Alain <alainm@pobox.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Does Postgresql have a similar pseudo-column "ROWNUM" as
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 14:48 -0300, Alain wrote: > > Andrew Sullivan escreveu: > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:07:00PM -0600, Dennis.Jiang@thomson.com wrote: > > > >>Does Postgresql have a similar pseudo-column "ROWNUM" as Oracle? If > >>so, we can write the following query: > > > > > > No. What is the purpose of your query? You could use ORDER BY and > > LIMIT..OFFSET to do what you want. I think. > > The problem is probably speed. I have done a lot of tests, and when > OFFSET gets to a few thousands on a multimega-recs database, it gets > very very slow... is there not a similar loss of speed using ROWNUM on oracle? > ... Is there any other to work around that? if you are ordering by a unique key, you can use the key value in a WHERE clause. select ... where ukey>? order by ukey limit 100 offset 100; (the ? is placeholder for the last value of ukey returned from previous select) gnari
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: