Re: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP vs actual time
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP vs actual time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1114099269.13303.24.camel@state.g2switchworks.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP vs actual time (Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP vs actual time
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:21, Thomas Hallgren wrote: > Christopher J. Bottaro wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Ahh, thanks for the tip. I guess I'll just stick with > > timeofday()::timestamp...its more concise anyways... > > > > Why use timeofday() at all? Why not now(). It will return a timestamptz > without casts. I think you missed the first part of the conversation, which was he needed a type that updated inside a transaction: # begin; # select timeofday()::timestamptz; 2005-04-21 10:59:58.181834-05 # select now(); 2005-04-21 10:59:50.286865-05 # select timeofday()::timestamptz; 2005-04-21 11:00:04.821057-05 # select now(); 2005-04-21 10:59:50.286865-05
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: