Re: Réf
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Réf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1112811790.92363.123.camel@home обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Réf ("Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Réf
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 19:42 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:18:29PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote: > > Yeah, I think that can be done provided there is more than one worker. > > My limit seems to be about 1000 transactions per second each with a > > single insert for a single process (round trip time down the Fibre > > Channel is large) but running 4 simultaneously only drops throughput to > > about 900 per process (total of 2400 transactions per second) and the > > machine still seemed to have lots of oomph to spare. > > Erm, have I missed something here? 900 * 4 = 2400? Nope. You've not missed anything. If I ran 10 processes and the requirement would be met. --
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: