Re: pg_dump large-file support > 16GB
| От | Rafael Martinez |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump large-file support > 16GB |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1111162708.30774.24.camel@linux.site обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump large-file support > 16GB (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 09:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no> writes: > > On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 10:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Is that a plain text, tar, or custom dump (-Ft or -Fc)? Is the behavior > >> different if you just write to stdout instead of using --file? > > > - In this example, it is a plain text (--format=3Dp). > > - If I write to stdout and redirect to a file, the dump finnish without > > problems and I get a dump-text-file over 16GB without problems. > > In that case, you have a glibc or filesystem bug and you should be > reporting it to Red Hat. The *only* difference between writing to > stdout and writing to a --file option is that in one case we use > the preopened "stdout" FILE* and in the other case we do > fopen(filename, "w"). Your report therefore is stating that there > is something broken about fopen'd files. > Thanks for the information. I will contact RH. -- Rafael Martinez, <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no> Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo, Norway PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: