I'm curious what kind of performance differences there would be over
using something like the nested-set model?
Would this be faster, or slower?
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:02 +0300, Evgen Potemkin wrote:
> Hi hackers!
>
> I have done initial implementation of SQL99 WITH clause (attached).
> It's now only for v7.3.4 and haven't a lot of checks and restrictions.
> It can execute only simple WITH queries like
> WITH tree AS (SELECT id,pnt,name,1::int AS level FROM t WHERE id=0
> UNION SELECT t.id,t.pnt,t.name,tree.level+1 FROM t JOIN tree ON
> tree.id=t.pnt ) SELECT * FROM tree;
> It would be great if someone with knowledge of Pg internals can make a
> kind of code review and make some advices how to better implement all
> this.
>
> Regards, Evgen.
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Mike Benoit <ipso@snappymail.ca>