Re: idea for concurrent seqscans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Дата
Msg-id 1109376273.4089.169.camel@jeff
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 13:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org> writes:
> > I didn't consider that. Is there a reason the regression tests assume
> > the results will be returned in a certain order (or a consistent order)?
> 
> We use diff as the checking tool.
> 

Well, that does make testing more difficult, or it at least requires
extra work to make the regression tests understand the results better.

I'll sumbmit a better patch, and then if everyone decides it's worth the
hassle with the regression tests, we can use it in 8.1. Some more
testing is required to see if the results are really as good as we hope.

Regards,Jeff Davis



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Modifying COPY TO