Re: linux world and table partitioning
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: linux world and table partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1109025793.3801.139.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: linux world and table partitioning ("Timothy D. Witham" <wookie@osdl.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 08:48 -0800, Timothy D. Witham wrote: > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 07:59 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >A lot of Oracle guys came up to the booth and one of them asked specifically > > >about table partitioning. He asked "when is it going to get done?" and "if we > > >want to do it why aren't we canvassing the corporate world (or a particular > > >company) to sponsor it?". > > > > > > > > > > > Interesting. Well I can tell you that Command Prompt routinely > > pursues companies to help push features back into the source. > > The ECPG changes we submitted and some upcoming ODBC features > > are an example of this. > > > > However what we have found is that most people running PostgreSQL > > don't need table partitioning. We only have 3 customers that > > would benefit from it. > > > > I think that a better survey would be the number of people > who decided that they couldn't use PostgreSQL because > they felt that they really needed table partitioning. Yes, I know some of those. I will be looking to make ground on an effective solution to that for 8.1. Best Regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: