Re: ARC patent
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ARC patent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1106092080.22946.172.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ARC patent (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ARC patent
Re: ARC patent |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 18:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I have already > suggested to core that we should insist on 8.1 not requiring an initdb, > so as to ensure that people will migrate up to it easily from 8.0. So is it firm policy that changes that require a catversion update cannot be made during the 8.1 cycle? (Needless to say, it would be good to get this sorted out early on in the 8.1 development cycle, to avoid the need to revert patches at some point down the line. For those of us working on large projects that will definitely require an initdb, it would also be good to know -- as this policy will likely prevent that work from getting into 8.1) -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: