Re: ext3
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ext3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1106012873.2886.516.camel@jeff обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ext3 (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ext3
Re: ext3 |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 07:43 +0700, David Garamond wrote: > Tzahi Fadida wrote: > > I recommend you don't use ext3 for any database: > > http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/0641.html > > > > apparently its still buggy. > > So what is the recommended fs under Linux? I don't need the best > speed/throughput, but I prefer not to use ext2 due to long fsck time. I Wouldn't ext2 also allow the possibility of a missing file? Even though postgres does WAL, couldn't ext2 forget a file or not record that a new file has been created? In other words, does PostgreSQL assume that the filesystem at least journals the metadata? Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: