Re: MySQL 5 comparison
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1104975439.2886.55.camel@jeff обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL 5 comparison (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL 5 comparison
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
What caught my eye is the "strict mode". I wonder if they are going to start promoting the reporting of errors? Right now MySQL seems to have the philosophy that "if the input is wrong, it is better to do something than nothing" (e.g. inserting Feb 31st into a date field). Perhaps they're trying to change that philosophy slowly with this strict mode? Regards, Jeff Davis On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 15:23 -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:42:23AM -0500, Ned Lilly wrote: > > Has anyone spent any time with the MySQL 5.0 alpha, set to go into > > beta shortly > > (http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/01/04/HNmysql5beta_1.html)? > > > > Would be interesting to have a rudimentary comparison checklist - > > not so much benchmarks, as features, as they seem to have added a > > lot. And any info on how they've implemented these features (e.g. > > multiple table types in order to use different features, etc.) would > > be of interest. > > Anybody who's interested may want to check this: > > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/News-5.0.x.html > > There are 4 more links at the bottom of that page that will help. > > Cheers, > D
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: