Re: Not wanting to throw a wrench in things
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Not wanting to throw a wrench in things |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1103580083.5774.252.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Not wanting to throw a wrench in things ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Not wanting to throw a wrench in things
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 16:48, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >>Well we could if we used their API. I might be able to get > >>special permission to get a greater search quota if we did > >>that. > >> > >>Although... in this instance I don't think the "look" is relevant. > >>Google is a huge brand and their search engine is better than > >>anything we are going to come up with. > >> > >> > > > >Agreed it's a much better engine, but fine tuning queries to specific > >parts of the sites might be more difficult. > > > >Not to mention that we would have to wait up to a month (or whatever the > >Google cycle currently is) for posts on archives and news etc. to get > >archived. That is definitely not a option imho. > > > > > Hey -- what if I can convince them to donate one of their > appliances? We would get the google engine and we could make > it look any way we want and index as much as we want? > There is something to be said for using a search engine powered by a postgresql database. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: