Re: nodeAgg perf tweak

On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 08:25 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'd be a little twitchy about new memory contexts at this stage of beta,
> but if the code is fairly well isolated that could be good.

This would be for 8.1 anyway.

> Would it possible to differentiate between well-known builtin functions
> and added transition functions?

IMHO, this would be ugly and add unnecessary complexity. I'd like to
find a solution that actually fixes the problem, rather than just
working around it in the common case.

-Neil