Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> That's what I was thinking. I saw your other email about LATERAL for 9.1
> -- would it be helpful for me to work on this issue for 9.1? After all,
> about 7 years ago I said I'd do it ;-). Or do you think it will be an
> integral part of the LATERAL work?
Dunno. What I was actually wanting to focus on is the problem of
generalizing nestloop inner indexscans so that they can use parameters
coming from more than one join level up. Robert suggested that LATERAL
might fall out of that fairly easily, but I haven't thought much about
it yet.
regards, tom lane