Re: More then 1600 columns?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: More then 1600 columns? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11011.1289578120@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: More then 1600 columns? ("Mark Mitchell" <mmitchell@riccagroup.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: More then 1600 columns?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
"Mark Mitchell" <mmitchell@riccagroup.com> writes:
> I know storing in an array is possible but it makes it so much easier to query the data set when each element is in
itsown field. I had lots of comments on why I should not do this and the possible alternatives and I thank everyone for
theirinput but no one answered the question about compiling with a higher block size to get more columns. Can anyone
answerthat?
Yes, I did answer it: there is no such compilation option.
If you were willing to run a very nonstandard version of Postgres, you
could try widening t_hoff (see src/include/access/htup.h) but there is
nobody who can tell you what the fallout from that might be. One big
concern that I would have is the likelihood of O(N^2) behavior on very
long query targetlists.
On the whole I think you'd be a lot better off looking into hstore,
especially the improved 9.0 version.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: