Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
> I'm still trying to understand the implications of the proposal, which
> sounds good but… given just enough load on the slave, wouldn't it be
> playing catchup all the time?
Uh, if the slave is overloaded, *any* implementation will be playing
catchup all the time. Not sure about your point here.
regards, tom lane