Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design

Actually all of this call for a vote seems a little premature IMHO. We
have problems with both designs that need to be addressed. Let's see
what shakes out from that discussion before we put it up for a vote,
after all we just might form a consensus anyway.

Robert Treat

On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 15:17, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> I'm not talking about opening it to input and design suggestions, i'm
> talking about a vote:
>
> A if you like the design at url1
> B if you like the design at url2
>
> Not open ended, not allowing for people to say "yeah but do this or do that"
>
> Gavin
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> Sorry, but the site has goals of things it needs to accomplish and that
> >>> goes beyond "looking cool". I've worked in usability and information
> >>> architecture and know the things that need to be accomplished with an
> >>> organizations main website and if you leave it up to the general public
> >>> your looking for trouble.
> >>> Robert Treat
> >>>
> >> Appearance and usability are both important factors.  Are you saying
> >> that people outside of -www are not capable of judging both?
> >
> >
> > The wider the audience, the harder it becomes to come to a consensus
> > ... those that are interested in the web site developments have/should
> > join the -www list, just like you did, and put in their 2 cents ...
> >
> > ----
> > Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services
> > (http://www.hub.org)
> > Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ:
> > 7615664
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
> > your
> >      joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL