Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1100127101.4442.703.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 21:35, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:28:12PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > Externally, everybody thinks that there should be just one, just like > > there is for other databases. > > I guess it's this thing that I want to understand. Why do people > believe that? I try not to ask "why" people believe what they do. It's usually makes no sense. > Because other databases, where "other" are "the ones > I'd actually run important systems on" _don't_ have just one. OK. I guess the big O have RAC, Data Guard, ASD, Advanced Replication, Streams... The perception is there though: O Replication Perhaps we should refer to PostgreSQL methods like this... HA Slony Replication eRserver Log Shipping PITR Load Balancing pgpool That would do it-ish -- Best Regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: