Re: BUG #18663: synchronous_standby_names vs synchronous_commit vs pg_stat_replication
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18663: synchronous_standby_names vs synchronous_commit vs pg_stat_replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10e94fed-70ab-4269-8145-41d05e55fa10@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #18663: synchronous_standby_names vs synchronous_commit vs pg_stat_replication (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2025/01/09 9:35, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > On 2024/10/21 18:43, Fujii Masao wrote: >> >> >> On 2024/10/18 23:48, PG Bug reporting form wrote: >>> The following bug has been logged on the website: >>> >>> Bug reference: 18663 >>> Logged by: Asphator >>> Email address: asphator@gmail.com >>> PostgreSQL version: 15.7 >>> Operating system: RHEL7+ >>> Description: >>> >>> Hello >>> >>> I would like to raise 2 issues: >>> - documentation issue >>> - pg_stat_replication view issue in a very specific use case >>> >>> 1. Documentation >>> Regarding parameter synchronous_standby_names, I did not manage to find >>> anything in documentation preventing from setting value 0. The only thing >>> I've found is a comment in a commit of 2016. Would be nice to mention in >>> documentation that value must be a "positive" integer. >> >> Agreed. I've attached the patch. > > I made a slight wording adjustment. > Unless there are objections, I'll commit the attached patch. Pushed. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: