Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance of generic atomics

On 2017-09-06 14:54, Sokolov Yura wrote:
> On 2017-09-06 07:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
>>> What scale factor and client count? How many cores per socket?  It 
>>> looks
>>> like Sokolov was just starting to see gains at 200 clients on 72 
>>> cores,
>>> using -N transaction.
>> This means that Sokolov's proposed changes in atomics/generic.h
>> ought to be uninteresting for performance on any platform we care 
>> about --- at
>> least for pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32().
> 
> May I cite you this way:

I apologize for tone of my previous message.
My tongue is my enemy.

-- 
Sokolov Yura aka funny_falcon
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.ru
The Russian Postgres Company