Re: RFD
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1099907402.6942.4448.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFD (Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFD
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 05:26, Mike Cox wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > I saw a post indicating a request for discussion on the creation of an > > official big 8 newsgroup comp.databases.postgresql.general. According to > > the notice this newsgroup already exists in google groups and is actively > > being used. The discussion will be in news.groups. > > Actually, the group does exist and is spread out on some servers across the > world. Google carries it as you mentioned, as does netfront.net. > > The problem is that the postgresql groups have not gone through the offical > process that is required in order to be a comp.* group. Because of this > many servers consider the groups "bogus" and refuse to carry them. Having > a rogue "comp" group is considered bad, and the correct thing is either be > under an alt, such as alt.databases.postgresql.general OR go through the > official process of becoming a member of the comp.* hierarchy. > > The process of going under the comp hierarchy is simple in that a Request > for Discussion is filed (RFD), and then 21 days later a call for votes > (CFV) is issued. That is where everyone here should vote for postgresql to > be a member of the "big 8". > Will you post the CFV link on GENERAL (and here) when it comes out? That will help us all pitch in. -- Best Regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: