Re: Failure with 004_logrotate in prairiedog
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Failure with 004_logrotate in prairiedog |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 109974.1626586938@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Failure with 004_logrotate in prairiedog (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Failure with 004_logrotate in prairiedog
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > prairiedog has failed in a way that seems a bit obscure to me: > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2021-07-18%2000%3A23%3A29 > ... > We could use some eval blocks in this area, but a non-atomic rename() > would cause problems in more areas. Thoughts? Awhile back we discovered that old macOS versions have non-atomic rename [1]. I eventually shut down dromedary because that was causing failures often enough to be annoying. I'd not seen such a failure before on prairiedog, but it sure seems plausible that this is one. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2636.1569016167@sss.pgh.pa.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: