Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
| От | Rod Taylor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Better Hardware, worst Results |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1099609109.1647.727.camel@home обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Better Hardware, worst Results (al_nunes@atua.com.br) |
| Ответы |
Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
Re: Better Hardware, worst Results |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 17:42, al_nunes@atua.com.br wrote: > Citando Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>: > > Please send an explain analyze from both. > I'm sendin three explains. In the first the Dell machine didn't use existing > indexes, so I turn enable_seqscan off (this is the second explain). The total > cost decreased, but the total time not. The third explain refers to the cheaper > (and faster) machine. The last thing is the query itself. All 3 plans have crappy estimates. Run ANALYZE in production, then send another explain analyze (as an attachment please, to avoid linewrap).
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: