On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 07:35, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Is there any reason that we don't have pg_functions, pg_users, pg_groups and
> other system views? pg_tables and pg_views is really useful, but it would
> be good to cover the other items as well.
pg_functions might be useful, but what would pg_users offer that pg_user
does not already do?
A pg_sequences view might also be handy.
-Neil