Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10986.1033922774@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> writes:
> I personally would at least like to see an aio implementation and would
> be willing to even help benchmark it to benchmark/validate any returns
> in performance. Surely if testing reflected a performance boost it
> would be considered for baseline inclusion?
It'd be considered, but whether it'd be accepted would have to depend
on the size of the performance boost, its portability (how many
platforms/scenarios do you actually get a boost for), and the extent of
bloat/uglification of the code.
I can't personally get excited about something that only helps if your
server is starved for RAM --- who runs servers that aren't fat on RAM
anymore? But give it a shot if you like. Perhaps your analysis is
pessimistic.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: