Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
Дата
Msg-id 10986.1033922774@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
Ответы Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> writes:
> I personally would at least like to see an aio implementation and would
> be willing to even help benchmark it to benchmark/validate any returns
> in performance.  Surely if testing reflected a performance boost it
> would be considered for baseline inclusion?

It'd be considered, but whether it'd be accepted would have to depend
on the size of the performance boost, its portability (how many
platforms/scenarios do you actually get a boost for), and the extent of
bloat/uglification of the code.

I can't personally get excited about something that only helps if your
server is starved for RAM --- who runs servers that aren't fat on RAM
anymore?  But give it a shot if you like.  Perhaps your analysis is
pessimistic.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Copeland
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New lock types