Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns.
Дата
Msg-id
1098251.1744426831@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Vinod Sridharan  writes:
>  -- create textops operator class without triconsistent

OK, got it, and I concur that we need to make shimTriConsistentFn()
restore the state of the entryRes array before it returns.  But
I don't understand why you're concerned about "However, this would
also reset it during the regular triConsistent check per tuple"?
I think the point is basically that this function is violating
the expectation that triconsistent functions not change the state
of that array.  That expectation doesn't depend on what the call
site is.

			regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
FAQ