Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns.
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns.
Дата
Msg-id
1098251.1744426831@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. (Vinod Sridharan)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Vinod Sridharan <vsridh90@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Vinod Sridharan <vsridh90@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Vinod Sridharan <vsridh90@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Vinod Sridharan <vsridh90@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #18831: Particular queries using gin-indexes are not interruptible, resulting is resource usage concerns. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Vinod Sridharan writes: > -- create textops operator class without triconsistent OK, got it, and I concur that we need to make shimTriConsistentFn() restore the state of the entryRes array before it returns. But I don't understand why you're concerned about "However, this would also reset it during the regular triConsistent check per tuple"? I think the point is basically that this function is violating the expectation that triconsistent functions not change the state of that array. That expectation doesn't depend on what the call site is. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
От: Vinod Sridharan
Дата: