Re: additional GCC warnings
От
Neil Conway
Тема
Re: additional GCC warnings
Дата
Msg-id
1098068475.22986.127.camel@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Re: additional GCC warnings (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
additional GCC warnings Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: additional GCC warnings Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: additional GCC warnings Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: additional GCC warnings Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: additional GCC warnings Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: additional GCC warnings "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv@xs4all.nl>
Re: additional GCC warnings Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 12:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We've always used -Wmissing-prototypes.
>
> We've always used both.
My apologies -- I don't know where I got the opposite impression.
> Hmm, it looks like -Wmissing-prototypes may be a superset of
> -Wmissing-declarations --- it seems to say that the latter will be
> content with a K&R style declaration ("extern int foo();") but the
> former will not. If that's a correct reading then we could drop
> -Wmissing-declarations.
Ok, that makes sense.
-Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
