Re: SELECT FOR UPDATE and LIMIT 1 behave oddly

On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 15:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> Au contraire: every row that gets locked will be returned to the client.
> The gripe at hand is that the number of such rows may be smaller than
> the client wished, because the LIMIT step is applied before we do the
> FOR UPDATE step

Ah, my apologies -- I misunderstood. Clearly not enough coffee this
morning :-)

Sorry for the noise.

-Neil