Re: Difference between IN and JOIN
| От | Markus Bertheau |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Difference between IN and JOIN |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1096899829.2651.13.camel@dicaprio.akademie1.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Difference between IN and JOIN (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
В Пнд, 04.10.2004, в 16:17, Tom Lane пишет: > Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de> writes: > > I lately wondered if there is a difference between a JOIN and a IN in > > queries similar to the following: > > > SELECT f1 FROM t1 JOIN t2 ON (t.f2 = t2.f2) WHERE t2.f3 = x > > > SELECT f1 FROM t1 WHERE t1.f2 IN (SELECT f2 FROM t2 WHERE f3 = x) > > > As I see it there's no semantic difference between the two. > > There's plenty of difference, if t2 contains repeated occurrences of f2 > values. In my case f2 is the primary key of t2. I probably didn't state the point of my question well enough: You can write an IN query as a semantically equal JOIN. I wondered, which one I should prefer, and on which grounds. Thanks -- Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de>
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: