Re: LDFLAGS overriding
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LDFLAGS overriding |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1096528856.25277.192.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LDFLAGS overriding (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: LDFLAGS overriding
Re: LDFLAGS overriding |
Список | pgsql-patches |
[ CC'ing Peter since this is usually his area ] On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 02:10, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I think your 'override' fix is correct. Personally I think override > should be used in most cases in our code because we are usually careful > to add to any flags already supplied by the user. Ok, I think 'override' is definitely correct for the instance the patch fixes, since the build breaks otherwise. Therefore I intend to apply the patch I posted earlier to HEAD shortly, barring any objections. In addition, we modify LDFLAGS in the following places: (1) src/Makefile.global.in -- adding rpath flags (2) src/Makefile.global.in -- adding LDFLAGS due to COPT/PROFILE (3) src/makefiles/Makefile.hpux (4) src/makefiles/Makefile.irix (5) src/makefiles/Makefile.qnx4 (6) src/makefiles/Makefile.svr4 What do folks think about using override in these situations? -Neil
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: