Re: Press Release, Final Draft?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Press Release, Final Draft? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1095967957.14485.167.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Press Release, Final Draft? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Press Release, Final Draft?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 14:20, Josh Berkus wrote: > Robert, > > > Unless I am confused, the two features that we have are really Vacuum > > and Vacuum Full. "Lazy Vacuum" is just a nickname that people use to > > help differentiate it from full vacuums, but it is not a real feature > > name, which is one of the reasons you wont find it mentioned in the docs > > anywhere. > > Um, you prepare the Weekly News every week; how could you have missed this? > Jan added adjustible delay settings for VACUUM which breaks it up into > interruptable chunks, and interferes much less with concurrent I/O activity. > This is a new feature -- I think you're just confused because Jan submitted > it less than 2 months after 7.4 was released. > > However, Jan did have a second name for this if both you and Robert don't like > Lazy Vacuum, which is Vacuum Delay. > :-) I missed it because I have always refereed to *that* as "vacuum delay", which is also how it is referenced in the docs. Yes, that stuff is certainly new, but the thing that I conceptualize as "lazy vacuum" (the lock friendly vacuum) is not... hence my confusion with your wording. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: