Re: Issues regarding code license of ported code.
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issues regarding code license of ported code. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1095549995.1544.520.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issues regarding code license of ported code. ("John R Pierce" <pierce@hogranch.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issues regarding code license of ported code.
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
I'd also like to understand the use of the LPGL license on a postgresql interface? I'd go further than saying businesses are ambivalent about GPL, and or LPGL; in my experience business's prefer the freebsd license. Dave On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 18:08, John R Pierce wrote: > > Keep saying Npgsql is licensed as LGPL as the new ported code will be > > licensed under LGPL. > > the PostgreSQL project uses the BSD license. Why is Npgsql using LGPL ? > > .NET likely appeals primarily to business developers... Many businesses are > ambivalent about GPL. > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match -- Dave Cramer 519 939 0336 ICQ # 14675561 www.postgresintl.com
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: