Re: fsync vs open_sync
От | Steve Bergman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fsync vs open_sync |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1094361402.28425.31.camel@voyager.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fsync vs open_sync (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: fsync vs open_sync
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 23:47 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > The world rejoiced as merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com ("Merlin Moncure") wrote: > > Ok, you were right. I made some tests and NTFS is just not very > > good in the general case. I've seen some benchmarks for Reiser4 > > that are just amazing. > > Reiser4 has been sounding real interesting. > Are these independent benchmarks, or the benchmarketing at namesys.com? Note that the APPEND, MODIFY, and OVERWRITE phases have been turned off on the mongo tests and the other tests have been set to a lexical (non default for mongo) mode. I've done some mongo benchmarking myself and reiser4 loses to ext3 (data=ordered) in the excluded tests. APPEND phase performance is absolutely *horrible*. So they just turned off the phases in which reiser4 lost and published the remaining results as proof that "resier4 is the fastest filesystem". See: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=109363302000856 -Steve Bergman
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: