Re: PostgreSQL giving jitters to Skypak
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL giving jitters to Skypak |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1094310577.7735.11.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL giving jitters to Skypak ("V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems]" <sank89@sancharnet.in>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL giving jitters to Skypak
Re: PostgreSQL giving jitters to Skypak |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 02:19, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 10:16 am, Scott Marlowe wrote: > > Any chance we can get cxotoday to post a followup article about how the > > postgresql community contacted the company and helped them fix their > > problems? > > We have reasons to believe that some other publication would be a better > choice. > > I tried contacting PC Quest, India but they have not responded in last three > days. I need to follow up bit more. I believe no other publication could be better since a) no other publication would have the same impact as the original one that posted the "hit piece" and b) the same audience may not be reached by another publication. However, I'm aware of the other possible arguments against publishing in cxotoday. Specifically, the original piece came across as a hackish attack with little or no research done on the part of the author other than to overhear a lunchtime conversation about how PostgreSQL just wasn't cutting it somewhere. However, it may be that this experience, and the telling of it to said author would be an eye opening experience for him (or her, I didn't really check.) I certainly believe that whoever publishes this story should reference the original one, and the incredibly professional way the postgresql community has handled it.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: